A.D. Tupper & Associates
Limited
Vehicle Launch Analysis
Introduction
When
a vehicle or an object loses support from the ground it is launched
into the air. It then travels horizontally at the same horizontal
speed it had when launched, until it falls back to the ground.
The fall may start as an initial upward, level or downward movement.
This type of motion can be assessed mathematically to get the
speed at start of the launch, and the process seems to be a particular
favorite, and a seductive trap, for police officers and other
non-engineer reconstruction analysts.
Terms
In
order to clarify the terms, I set out the following definitions:
1. A
fall occurs when a vehicle is traveling forward, and is
no longer supported by the surface over which it is moving.
2. A
flip occurs when a sideways moving vehicle meets resistance,
such as through striking the curb, and rises and moves through
the air. It is thus contrasted with a rollover, which may occur
without the wheels digging in.
3. A
vault occurs when a car moving forward or rearward, meets
resistance, digs in and flips end over end.
Applicable
Cases
Although
relatively few cases involve significant flights of vehicles
or objects, this type of analysis can be useful when applied
properly to collisions involving:
- Pedestrian
impact;
- Motorcycle/rider
separation;
- Vehicle
travel over an embankment or into a body of water;
- Travel
over a ditch or a steep grade; and
- Vehicle
rollovers.
Required
Data
The
basis of the launch analysis is that once a vehicle or object
separates from the ground, it will follow a ballistic arc while
in the air. The following information can be used to calculate
the speed at which the vehicle left the ground:
1. Accurate
location of vehicle centre of gravity (CG) at the point of launch.
2. Accurate
location of vehicle CG at the first point of landing.
3. Difference
in elevation of the vehicle CG between the launch and landing
points.
4. The
angle of launch.
Cautions!!!
It
is especially important for analysts to understand the background
and theory of a launch formulae, before relying upon the results
of blind number plugging, in the manual formula, or a computer
or a hank-held calculator. People without a proper physics background
can be mislead, by their misinterpretation and in turn can mislead
others, such as the court.
In
one case I examined, for example, the police officer had used
in the equation a horizontal azimuth angle where a vertical launch
angle was called for. He did not understand the derivation or
purpose of the formula, and did not comprehend his fatal flaw,
even after the fact was pointed out to him.
As
typically used, the relevant equations make several assumptions
that can influence the results adversely. The equations ignore
the effects of wind and air resistance. In most cases, these
affects will be negligible but they may be significant for high-speed
misadventures, or for objects that are not as dense as vehicles
and people. Two factors that always have a significantly bearing
on the truth of the results, however, are:
- The accuracy of the
launch angle; and
- The horizontal travel
distance of the objects CG.
If
the vehicle left the ground while traveling over uneven terrain
or because it flipped off a curb or guardrail, for example, the
launch angle will be difficult to evaluate with any reasonable
degree of accuracy, unless it bruised a tree or punched a hole
in a fence or wall. A range of angular values will thus have
to be considered, because the assessment is extremely sensitive
to the departure angle.
Vehicle
rotation and suspension movement can also affect the evaluation
of the horizontal travel distance from launch to contact. These
will be especially important if said distance is not several
times the length of the vehicle.
Conclusion
In
summary, the family of launch formulae has the potential of producing
an accurate evaluation of speed of a vehicle in a launch, call,
flip, or vault. The analysis is very sensitive to such variables
as the launch angle, which is exceedingly difficult to quantify,
and is thus prone to bad answers, particularly when used by inexperienced
or improperly trained analysts.
All interested parties, including
analysts, insurance representatives, police, crown, defense counsel,
and the court, should be prepared to test the assumptions and
examine the particular application of this process of speed determination.
|